Building vs. Buying Data Pipelines
In recent years, a plethora of cloud-based applications and services have emerged, promising to streamline processes and increase efficiency. However, this abundance of services has also introduced a new challenge for data leaders: complexity. Despite the expectation that cloud-based systems would facilitate standardization of data management, the opposite is occurring due to the disparate designs and purposes of these systems across various industries. As a result, creating a cohesive data infrastructure is a complex task for data leaders, who must consider multiple factors.
May 11, 2023
Foundational Elements for Data-Driven Strategies
Establishing a robust data architecture is crucial for implementing successful data-driven strategies in your organization. The foundational elements of this architecture typically include a linear sequence of steps, beginning with data sources and culminating in storage or analysis tools, all linked by a data pipeline, which may be an ETL solution or integration service. While there are several established tools for data warehousing and dashboarding, the realm of data integration software is still developing. As a result, data professionals must seek solutions for their data pipelines that account for present and future requirements.
Neglecting the pipeline stage could lead to disastrous consequences - an unstable data pipeline may result in corrupted, unreliable data that requires hours of extra effort to rectify. Hence, data architects are faced with a crucial decision: whether to construct their own pipelines from the beginning or invest in an integration service.
The Challenges of Building Your Own Data Pipelines
Many data architects opt for the first option of building their own pipelines to maintain managerial control over the entire process and to customize the pipelines to their specific needs. However, this approach poses several challenges, including but not limited to:
Inconsistent documentation: With diverse systems, each data channel comes with unique API documentation that varies in its process and level of detail.
Unreliable APIs: Not all APIs are equally reliable, and engineers are likely to face breakdowns and changes that require manual fixes.
Distracted team: In-house projects can distract developers and engineers from their primary responsibilities for weeks.
Low-quality integrations: Most workers who build in-house integrations lack expertise, leading to lower-quality pipelines and difficulties fixing breakdowns.
Transferability: When the developer who built the integrations leaves, it may be difficult to ensure that the next team can access everything they need without proper documentation.
The cost of maintenance may be the most critical factor to consider. Even if we set aside the significant expense of the human labor required to construct intricate integrations (which can take several weeks at a minimum), we cannot ignore the long-term obligation. Your data pipelines must be dependable and able to deliver your data on a consistent basis for the effort to be worthwhile. Achieving this requires continuous attention and upkeep to accommodate API modifications.
Given these factors, the appeal of the "DIY" approach diminishes.
Bringing in the Experts: Using Integration Tools
Some managers may reject the idea of outsourcing their pipelines, claiming additional expenses and a loss of control. However, these decision-makers are disregarding the long-term advantages for the sake of immediate savings, which, as mentioned earlier, are typically non-existent.
The decision to invest in an established data integration service comes with a multitude of benefits, including:
Increased time efficiency: Integration tools can create data pipelines in a fraction of the time it takes to manually build them, freeing up developers to focus on their primary responsibilities.
Cost savings: Hiring a data integration service is often more cost-effective than spending money on manual labor for building and maintenance.
Expertise: With professional management of pipelines, experienced professionals can handle breakdowns and ensure smooth data flow.
Scalability: Integration services often offer the ability to add data sources quickly, making expansion easier and providing a sustainable long-term solution for data infrastructure.
Convenience: Building pipelines manually can be tedious and frustrating, making the price of a third-party service worth the relief of the associated headache.
Selecting the Suitable Integration Solution
When selecting a data integration tool, it's essential to not only look for the benefits discussed earlier but also consider an additional factor: flexibility. In addition to scalability, you want a tool that can adapt to your data architecture and evolve with your business as it adopts new storage and dashboarding solutions. However, not all integration services can seamlessly transition when their customers want to change their architecture. Dataddo is a tool that provides flexible connectors, affordability, and top-tier support.
In conclusion, when it comes to your data pipelines, opting for an integration service is the clear choice for ease and quality. The build versus buy debate? Buying wins every time.